While acknowledging that the former Ministers of the Economy and Finance, Polycarpe Abah Abah, and Public Health, Urbain Olanguena Awono, could be guilty of misappropriation of public funds, the primary motive of their arrests, beyond reasonable doubt, rests on differing political ideologies in a regime that nourishes dearth of a democracy of opinion.
In a bid to settle scores in a political system where everyone in government is obliged to speak the language of his master, and as much as you dance to his tune and without coveting his office, you could embezzle and go free. The two former ministers, who show their disenchantment with the regime by identifying themselves as G11, must be suffering from embezzling, opposing and then coveting the king's palace.
Embezzlers and corrupt officials are simply innocent victims of a trap which depicts the failing democratic machinery in status quo. Like many Africans and particularly Cameroonians, I have spent the past five years evaluating the evolution of corruption in our country and have discovered that we have been playing around with wrong approaches to this cankerworm.
Everybody suffers from corruption, everybody suffers from embezzlement though some see their misery immediately the act is committed and others see it in the long run.Embezzlement of state funds has been a striking issue in Cameroon for the past two decades and I can remember when in 2001 people were shocked, frightened and at the same time excited to learn that the Minister of Post and Telecommunication then (Munchipou Seidou) was convicted and sentenced for years because of embezzlement. The billions of CFA he was accused of embezzling was really frightening.
From this severe governmental act, people thought no minister or any official would ever carry out this kind of inhuman and economic evil act. To our surprise, we discovered that barely four or five years after, other officials who were looked upon as patriots, intellectuals and hard working citizens, embezzled funds that were almost ten times that of Munchipou and this time some of them were sentenced to twenty years in jail.
Recently, many Cameroonian youths from the miserable class have been incarcerated for up to two-year jail terms for going to the street and crying out their miseries. The questions that came to my mind is what about all the anti-corruption measures taken by the highest authority who is at the same time the highest judge, the highest military official, I mean the highest all thing. What about the solutions brought in by the international community, NGOs, civil society, human rights groups, just to name these few?
What will happen in the next five or ten years? Are we still going to jail more officials? Are we still going to have more children killed in strikes? Are we still going to be observing a widening gap between the rich and the poor?
If you promote the belief that the more wealth you have, the more power you deserve or vice versa, then we are left with no option than to continue growing in the way of life we have today. Contrarily, if you tell people the more wealth you have, the less power you deserve and vice versa, then people will learn to use their wealth and power wisely. The trap here is the idea that more wealth is equivalent to more power.
Comments
There seem to be no end
Talking on the isue of embezzlers and different political ideologies, we seem to be suffering from a cankerworm that just goes around in circles.The concern here is that while these individuals get incarcerated, and rightly so for curroption issues, there seems to be no end in sight to the political woes of a people. Especially with the recent constitutional amendments that just happened.
Anyway not to keep on stating the obvious, GOD BLESS OUR COUNTRY.
Bamason
Only way out is to lead.
Many large farm animals have, I'm told, a particular tendency to push back against pressure. If a horse pins your leg to the barn door, don't get someone to try and push the animal off, because the animal will only increase the pressure. If your friend pushes on the other side, then the horse will push back against him or her, and release your leg.
The moral of the story that I get is a variation: some animals can be pulled, not pushed.
Insecure, greedy and destructive people are like those horses; there's no amount of name calling or shaming that's going to work - it'll only make the problem worse.
The only way to solve their issues with insecurity is to lead them away from it - for example if the poorer people choose not to use their weighted votes to weaken the overall financial situation, but instead strengthen it; then hopefully the wealthy will see that they don't need to horde so much and shame so much in order to feel self-worth.
Vote sizing forces every single one of us to sacrifice wealth for power, or power for wealth; and it's a way to show people that no one should have both, needs to have both, or is happy having both. Without striving for equality, it allows everyone to live together without fearing each other.
The way out of a loop is to first recognize and break the loop within. If you have objections to actually doing some to promote vote sizing, it's probably because you don't want to break that inner loop, you just want others to break theirs first.
Post new comment